Exploring Urological Malignancies on Pinterest: Content Analysis

Article Urology & Nephrology

Quality of Bladder Cancer Information on YouTube

Stacy Loeb et al.

Summary: Research found that information quality about bladder cancer on YouTube is generally poor, with a significant amount of misinformation and commercial bias present in some videos, reaching a large number of viewers. Moreover, the comments sections in some videos are used for seeking or providing medical advice and support.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Urology & Nephrology

Social media and misinformation in urology: what can be done?

Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh et al.

BJU INTERNATIONAL (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Andrology

Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube

Mesut Berkan Duran et al.

Summary: The study assessed the content, reliability and quality of information regarding testicular cancer in YouTube videos. The results showed that videos uploaded by physicians/nonprofit physicians/professional organisations/universities had significantly higher quality scores, indicating a positive correlation between video length, DISCERN and JAMA scores and GQS. YouTube is a widely used source for information about testicular cancer, but much of the content is of poor quality.

ANDROLOGIA (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Urology & Nephrology

TikTok and prostate cancer: misinformation and quality of information using validated questionnaires

Alex J. Xu et al.

BJU INTERNATIONAL (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Primary Health Care

Quality of YouTube Videos on Prostate Cancer Screening for Black Men

Nicholas Shungu et al.

Summary: This study evaluated the quality of information regarding prostate cancer screening for Black men on YouTube, finding that most videos had poor quality and only a few addressed racial disparities.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Oncology

Quality assessment of cancer patient education materials: the current state of systemic therapy patient education in fourteen cancer centres across Ontario, Canada

J. K. Papadakos et al.

Summary: An evaluation was conducted on the quality of printed education materials distributed by cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. Most materials scored low in terms of understandability and actionability, with readability levels above the recommended grade 6. This indicates a significant need for improvement in the quality of patient education materials provided by cancer centers.

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Letter Urology & Nephrology