4.4 Article

Functions of the Alzheimer's Disease Protease BACE1 at the Synapse in the Central Nervous System

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 60, 期 3, 页码 305-315

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12031-016-0800-1

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; BACE1; BACE inhibitors; Synapse; Sez6

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research (NHMRC)-Australian Research Council (ARC) Dementia Research Development Fellowship [1100324]
  2. NHMRC [1058672]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FOR 2290]
  4. Center for Excellence in Neurodegeneration (CoEN)
  5. Breuer Foundation
  6. Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT)
  7. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1100324, 1058672] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inhibition of the protease beta-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) is a promising treatment strategy for Alzheimer's disease, and a number of BACE inhibitors are currently progressing through clinical trials. The strategy aims to decrease production of amyloid-beta (A beta) peptide from the amyloid precursor protein (APP), thus reducing or preventing A beta toxicity. Over the last decade, it has become clear that BACE1 proteolytically cleaves a number of substrates in addition to APP. These substrates are not known to be involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease but have other roles in the developing and/or mature central nervous system. Consequently, BACE inhibition and knockout in mice results in synaptic and other neuronal dysfunctions and the key substrates responsible for these deficits are still being elucidated. Of the BACE1 substrates that have been validated to date, a number may contribute to the synaptic deficits seen with BACE blockade, including neuregulin 1, close homologue of L1 and seizure-related gene 6. It is important to understand the impact that BACE blockade may have on these substrates and other proteins detected in substrate screens and, if necessary, develop substrate-selective BACE inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据