4.2 Article

Fan Conflicts and State Power in China: Internalised Heteronormativity, Censorship Sensibilities, and Fandom Police

期刊

ASIAN STUDIES REVIEW
卷 47, 期 2, 页码 355-373

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10357823.2022.2112655

关键词

Fan conflicts; fandom police; state power; fan communities and subcommunities; heteronormativity; censorship; The Untamed; consumer culture; China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the relationship between fans and state power through a study of a large-scale fan conflict surrounding the popular 'Boys' Love'-adapted drama The Untamed in China. The study reveals a complex picture of two-way exploitation between fans and state power. Fans internalize reporting as a norm of legitimacy in consumer culture, but their practices are exploited by the state to censor media users' speech and cultural production.
Fans as consumers of cultural products have received a great deal of attention from sociologists and cultural studies academics in recent years, and research on the relationship between fans and state power is gradually gaining traction. Through a 12-month digital ethnography of a large-scale fan conflict surrounding The Untamed, a popular 'Boys' Love'-adapted drama in China, we uncover a complex picture of two-way exploitation between fans and state power. By doing so, the article challenges previous assumptions by Chinese and Western scholars that fan culture is resistant to or negotiates with mainstream culture. We show that by perpetuating heteronormativity and censorship, fans internalise 'reporting' as a norm of legitimacy in consumer culture. Some fans portray themselves as 'fandom police' and use censorship to report 'illegal' comments by their rivals in order to prevail in fan conflicts. However, the power gained by these fandom police is illusory. Their practices are exploited by the state as a tool for censoring media users' speech and cultural production, with the ultimate consequence of perpetuating censorship and heteronormativity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据