4.3 Article

Trait Mindfulness Decouples the Association Between System Justification and Racial Outgroup Attitudes

期刊

RACE AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 359-375

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12552-022-09377-0

关键词

Trait mindfulness; System justification; Outgroup attitudes; Intergroup relations; Intergroup anxiety

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the role of trait mindfulness in the relationship between racial-system justification, negative ethnic attitudes, and other-group orientation. The findings suggest that trait mindfulness can reduce the negative effects of system justification and mediate the relationship for individuals with low or moderate levels of trait mindfulness. These findings highlight the importance of understanding and reducing prejudice.
System justification theory suggests that high-status group members endorsing status hierarchies will favor their ingroup and may show less positive outgroup attitudes. Understanding which variables influence these relationships is important. We explored whether trait mindfulness would decouple the relationship between racial-system justification, negative ethnic attitudes, and other-group orientation, among samples of White Americans. Studies 1 and 2 suggested that trait mindfulness moderated (i.e., decoupled) the negative influences of system justification on the outcome variables. In some circumstances, intergroup anxiety mediated the findings for those low and moderate in trait mindfulness, as compared to those with high trait mindfulness. Our findings support the predictions of system justification theory but reveal that trait mindfulness can decouple the relationship between system justification and outgroup attitudes. This suggests that trait mindfulness may best serve as a moderator that decouples pernicious relationships, as compared to having direct influences on prejudice. These findings are important, because understanding factors which reduce prejudice are relevant given its persistence in the United States.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据