4.7 Article

Drug delivery systems: Study of inclusion complex formation for ternary caffeine-β-cyclodextrin-water mixtures from apparent molar volume values at 298.15 K and 310.15 K

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 223, 期 -, 页码 209-216

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.08.035

关键词

Drug delivery systems; Caffeine; beta-Cyclodextrin; Ternary aqueous mixtures; Apparent molar volumes; Viscosity

资金

  1. Coimbra Chemistry Centre
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT)
  3. Portuguese Agency for Scientific Research [UID/QUI/UI0313/2013]
  4. COMPETE
  5. FCT [SFRH/BPD/92851/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this paper is to provide insight into the molecular mechanisms of inclusion complex formation along with the structural understanding of drug carrier molecule interactions in aqueous ternary systems including caffeine and beta-cyclodextrin. Apparent partial molar volumes (V-phi) were determined from density experimental measurements for the binary aqueous solutions of both beta-cyclodextrin and caffeine, as well as for the ternary aqueous solutions in the low concentration range (i.e., corresponding to the therapeutic applications in the drug-releasing field). Mathematical modelling of this apparent molar property, assuming inclusion complexes of 1:1 stoichiometry, allowed the estimation of the corresponding equilibrium constant. Information about the driving forces for the insertion of the caffeine into the beta-cyclodextrin molecule was derived from the volume changes. Interactions between aqueous solutes and/or solute solvent interactions taking place in the solutions were evaluated from the volumes of transfer, Delta V-phi.c, and the viscosity B coefficients of transfer, Delta B, for the caffeine from water to the different aqueous solutions of beta-cydodextrin. The measurements were carried out at the standard (298.15 +/- 0.01) K and the physiological (310.15 +/- 0.01) K temperatures. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据