4.7 Article

Solubility and thermodynamic analysis of N′-(1-(N-(methyl) benzylaminomethyl)-2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)-2-(benzyloxy) benzohydrazide in different neat solvents at different temperatures

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 108-112

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.068

关键词

Correlation; Dissolution; Novel anticancer compound; Solubility; Thermodynamics

资金

  1. King Saud University, Vice Deanship of Research Chairs, Kayyali Chair for Pharmaceutical Industry [FN-2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study was undertaken to determine the solubilities of newly synthesized anticancer compound N'-(1-(N-(methyl)benzylaminomethyl)-2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)-2-(benzyloxy) benzohydrazide (NMBOBB) in nine different neat solvents including water, isopropanol (IPA), ethanol, ethylene glycol (EG), 1.2-propanediol (PG), 1-butanol, 2-butanol, polyethylene glycol-400 (PEG-400) and Transcutol (diethylene glycol monoethyl ether) at T = 298.15 K to 318.15 K and p = 0.1 MPa. Experimental solubility data of NMBOBB was fitted with Apelblat and ideal models. The mole fraction solubility of NMBOBB was recorded highest in PEG-400 (1.14 x 10(-2) at T = 318.15 K) followed by Transcutol (7.14 x 10(-3) at T = 318.15 K), 2-butanol (1.45 x 10(-3) at T = 318.15 K), 1-butanol (1.38 x 10(-3) at T = 318.15 K), ethanol (9.69 x 10(-4) at T = 318.15 K), PG (9.52 x 10(-4) at T = 318.15 K), IPA (9.41 x 10(-4) at T = 318.15 K), EG (8.09 x 10(-4) at T = 318.15 K) and water (3.00 x 10(-6) at T = 318.15 K). The highest solubility of NMBOBB in PEG-400 was possible due to lower polarity and higher molar mass of PEG-400. The dissolution behavior of NMBOBB was observed as an endothermic, spontaneous and an entropy-driven due to positive values of standard enthalpies, Gibbs free energies and entropies in all nine neat solvents investigated. The results of this work would be helpful in purification, recrystallization and dosage form design of NMBOBB. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据