4.7 Article

Adsorption of anionic azo dye Congo Red from aqueous solution by Cationic Modified Orange Peel Powder

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 540-548

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.119

关键词

Adsorption; Congo Red; Kinetics; Isotherms; Thermodynamics; Temperature

资金

  1. R&D Program for Society of the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [NRF-2013M3C8A3078596]
  2. R&D Center for Valuable Recycling (Global-Top Environmental Technology Development Program) - Ministry of Environment [GT-11-C-01-070-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the adsorption of Congo Red (CR), an anionic azo dye, from aqueous solution by using Cationic Modified Orange Peel Powder (CMOPP). The optimum conditions were determined by investigating the effects of pH, contact time, initial dye concentration and temperature. The adsorbent was characterized by FTIR analysis. The equilibrium data were analyzed using Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models. The maximum adsorption capacity of CR on CMOPP was estimated as 107, 144, and 163 mg/g, respectively, at different temperatures (298, 308 and 318 K). Langmuir model fitted the equilibrium data better than the Freundlich isotherm. The kinetic results demonstrated that the adsorption of CR onto CMOPP was well described by pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The activation energy of adsorption (Ea) was found to be 30 kJ/mol by using the Arrhenius equation. The calculated thermodynamic parameters (Delta G degrees, Delta H degrees and Delta S degrees) showed that the adsorption of CR onto CMOPP was feasible, spontaneous and endothermic. Desorption experiments were carried out to explore the feasibility of regenerating the adsorbent and the adsorbed CR from CMOPP was desorbed using 0.1 M NaOH. The results indicated that CMOPP can be considered as a potential adsorbent for the removal of CR from aqueous media. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据