4.0 Article

Thermal modeling of the convective heat transfer in the large air cavities of the 3D concrete printed walls

期刊

COGENT ENGINEERING
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2022.2130203

关键词

3D concrete printed walls; heat transfer; cavity walls; modeling

资金

  1. Dubai Electricity and Water Authority (DEWA) RD Center
  2. Innovation and entrepreneurial incubator in HCT
  3. HCT interdisciplinary grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cavity walls are commonly used in construction to reduce moisture and improve thermal performance. However, large cavities in 3D printed concrete walls have high convective heat transfers that affect thermal performance. The study shows that subdividing large cavities into smaller ones can significantly reduce heat transfer.
The cavity walls are a widely used construction system. They became popular in traditional masonry construction for their capacity to reduce the passage of moisture and improve the walls' thermal performance. However, the latter only applied to narrow cavities with restricted internal air movement. Cavities are also present in emerging technologies, such as 3D concrete printed walls. However, the large cavities of the 3D printed concrete walls have high convective heat transfers that affect the envelope's thermal performance. Therefore, the authors developed a conjugate heat transfer finite element model to study the large cavities in 3D printed concrete walls and determine the effect on the convective heat transfer of subdividing large cavities. The results show it is possible to reduce the heat flux four times, from 40.4 W/m2 to 9.1 W/m2, subdividing a large cavity into sixteen small ones. This reduction might be higher, increasing the number of cavity subdivisions. However, it is infeasible to restrict the air movements in unfilled air cavities over 25 mm wide for the Rayleigh numbers >= 10(5). Therefore, the practicality of minimizing heat transfer by subdividing large air cavities in 3D printed walls is limited.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据