4.2 Article

Deactivation causes of supported palladium catalysts for the oxidative carbonylation of phenol

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL
卷 424, 期 -, 页码 377-383

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2016.07.028

关键词

Diphenyl carbonate; Oxidative carbonylation; Deactivation causes; Pd leaching; Oxygen species

资金

  1. Key Laboratory of Green Chemical Process Ministry of Education [GCP201301]
  2. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2013CFB322]
  3. Hubei Provincial Department of Education [Q20131503]
  4. Opening Project of Hubei Key Laboratory of Lipid Chemistry and Nutrition [201505]
  5. Wuhan Institute of Technology [10112061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Palladium catalysts supported on manganese oxides octahedral molecular sieves (OMS-2), Pb doped OMS-2 (Pb-OMS-2) and perovskite-type La0.5Pb0.5MnO3 were prepared for investigating the deactivation causes of catalysts during the oxidative carbonylation of phenol. The catalytic experiments on three different sets of catalysts demonstrated that they were inactive after continuous reaction for 22 h. XRD patterns and HRTEM images demonstrated that carbonaceous pollution and palladium leaching occurred during the reaction process. The solvent and oxygen have significant impact on the palladium leaching by ICP-AES analysis. In addition, hot filtration tests and SH-HZSM-5 adsorption studies indicated that the leached palladium species are not active species. The results of XPS patterns and H-2-TPR profiles showed that aggregation and reduction of Pd species was another deactivation cause. It was discovered that lattice oxygen species decreased and palladium aggregated, which hindered the re-oxidation of Pd(0) to Pd(II). In summary, carbonaceous pollution, Pd leaching, aggregation and consumption of oxygen species hindered the redox recycling of palladium, which resulted in the deactivation of supported palladium catalysts for the oxidative carbonylation of phenol. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据