4.3 Article

Frequency spillovers and portfolio risk implications between Sukuk, Islamic stock and emerging stock markets

期刊

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 139-157

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2022.10.012

关键词

Islamic assets; BRICS; Co -movements; Multivariate wavelet approach

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the multiscale spillovers between five important emerging stock markets and Islamic stock market indices. The results show evidence of time-scale co-movements between conventional and Islamic stock markets, with short-term contagion and long-term fundamental contagion. The integration between the Islamic bond market and the conventional stock markets of the BRICS countries is relatively low. DJIM and DJ Sukuk provide risk diversification opportunities for BRICS stock market volatility.
This study examines the multiscale spillovers between five important emerging stock markets namely, Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) and both Dow Jones Islamic stock market index (DJIM) and Dow Jones Sukuk index (DJ Sukuk) using bivariate and multivariate wavelet approaches. The results show evidence of strong time-scale co-movements between conventional and Islamic stock markets at different frequencies. Moreover, the pure contagion is evident at the short-term whereas fundamental contagion appears in the long run. Sukuk show relatively less integration with the conventional stock markets of BRICS at high and medium frequencies. DJIM and DJ Sukuk provide risk diversification oppor-tunities for BRICS stock market volatility. The diversification benefits in terms of lower portfolio VaR is available in the high frequency scale or at the short-term. In long-run, the Islamic equity market become fundamentally integrated with the BRICS stock markets, thus, reduces hedging gains.& COPY; 2022 Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据