4.2 Article

'To be vigilant to leave no trace': secrecy, invisibility and abortion travel from the Republic of Ireland

期刊

CULTURE HEALTH & SEXUALITY
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 914-928

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2022.2107704

关键词

Abortion; secrecy; cross-border reproductive travel; reproductive rights; Republic of Ireland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the hardships faced by Irish residents while waiting for abortion care and the continued need for secrecy when traveling abroad for care. Despite the expansion of abortion access in Ireland in 2018, many women still have to travel for care. The need for secrecy perpetuates the invisibility of this important phenomenon.
Until 2018, abortion in the Republic of Ireland was banned in almost all circumstances under one of the most restrictive legal regimes in Europe. The main solution for Irish women and pregnant people seeking abortion services had been to pursue care abroad, typically in clinics in England. In this paper we focus on the hardships of waiting for abortion care experienced by Irish residents leading up to their travel for appointments in England in 2017 and 2018. Based on in-depth interviews with 53 Irish women collected at three British Pregnancy Advisory Services (BPAS) clinics in England we analyse women's experiences as they navigated an 'environment of secrecy' in Ireland. This included making specific secrecy efforts when navigating travel arrangements, conversations, movement, health records, and the travel itself. Despite the expansion of abortion access in Ireland in 2018, the need to travel abroad continues for many women. We argue that the continued need for secrecy when women have to travel abroad for care perpetuates this important phenomenon's invisibility. This argument also applies to other countries where abortion access is restricted, and women are forced to travel for care. We also caution against the presumption that all Irish residents are able to travel internationally for healthcare.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据