4.7 Review

The Densely O-Glycosylated MUC2 Mucin Protects the Intestine and Provides Food for the Commensal Bacteria

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 428, 期 16, 页码 3221-3229

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.02.010

关键词

mucus; glycosyltransferase; glycosylation; colon; small intestine

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Cancer Foundation
  3. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  4. IngaBritt and Arne Lundberg Foundation
  5. Sahlgren's University Hospital
  6. Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren's Foundation
  7. Torsten Soderberg Foundation
  8. Sahlgrenska Academy
  9. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [U01AI095473]
  10. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research-The Mucus-Bacteria-Colitis Center of the Innate Immunity Program
  11. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
  12. Lederhausen's Center for CF Research at University of Gothenburg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All mucins are highly O-glycosylated by variable glycans depending on species, histoblood group and organ. This makes the intestinal main mucin MUC2 non-degradable by the host digestive system but well by both commensal and pathogenic bacteria. The MUC2 glycans are important for selection of the commensal bacteria and act as a nutritional source for the bacteria; this also helps the host to recover some of the energy spent on constantly renewing the protective mucus layer. Glycosylation is the most diverse and common posttranslational modification of cell surfaces and secreted proteins. N-Glycosylation is most well studied and predictable, whereas O-glycosylation is more diverse and less well understood. O-Glycosylation is also often called mucin-type glycosylation as it is typical for mucins that often have more than 80% of the mass as O-glycans. This review will discuss the mucin-type O-glycosylation and especially the O-glycosylation of human and mice intestinal mucin MUC2 in relation to bacteria and disease. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据