4.7 Review

Measuring and visualising ?familiar strangers? among transit riders: An exploratory study of Brisbane, Australia

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103454

关键词

Familiar stranger; Smart card; Measurement framework; Big data

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aims to develop a new measurement framework that captures the full scope of the social phenomenon of familiar strangers in transit networks. Using smart card data for empirical analysis, the results have implications for policy and planning, and can be used for comparative studies in different situational and cultural contexts.
Public transport with high levels of patronage is the cornerstone of a sustainable city. Passengers' feelings of safety shapes an individuals' decision to utilise public transport that are informed in large part by the other people with which the transit stations and public transit trips are shared. Some of these people are unknown to us but considered - familiar strangers - in that we visually recognise the individuals but have never spoken to them. Our empirical understanding of this subtle yet important social phenomena known to impact sense of commu-nity, place attachment and feelings of safety remain in their infancy but with emergence of disaggregate sources of big data bourne from smart card technologies there exists new opportunities to measure and visualise potential familiar strangers in transit networks. The aim of the current study is to develop a new measurement framework that moves beyond existing work that measures familiar strangers via a single volumetric measure and introduce a suite of metrics capturing the full scope of the social phenomena within a transit network. Our measurement framework and associated metrics are operationalised using smart card data from Brisbane, Australia. Results hold implications for policy and planning, and it is hoped that the framework will be redeployed across other situational and cultural contexts forming a growing set of comparative studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据