4.5 Review

Factors influencing teacher self-efficacy for inclusive education: A systematic literature review

期刊

TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2022.103800

关键词

Teacher self -efficacy; Inclusive education; Inclusive education practices; Inclusive pedagogy; Primary school; Secondary school; In-service teachers; Pre-service teachers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that self-efficacy beliefs related to inclusive education have a positive impact on teaching practices and students. This study examines how teacher self-efficacy has been measured and the factors influencing the perceived self-efficacy of teachers in inclusive schools. A systematic literature search identified 71 studies on teacher self-efficacy in inclusive education practices. Analysis finds that teaching experience, teaching context, knowledge of inclusive education policies, confidence in teaching in inclusive classrooms, pre-service teacher education, professional learning, and experiential contact with people with disability all play influential roles in teacher self-efficacy.
Research illustrates that self-efficacy beliefs related to inclusive education impact teaching practices and could positively impact on students. This study explores how teacher self-efficacy has been measured and the factors that influence the perceived self-efficacy of teachers within inclusive schools. A systematic search for literature examining teacher self-efficacy for inclusive education practices yielded 71 studies for review. Analysis revealed that teaching experience and teaching context impacted selfefficacy. Knowledge of inclusive education policies elevated the self-efficacy beliefs of teachers. Confidence in teaching in inclusive classrooms, pre-service teacher education, professional learning and experiential contact with people with disability were also influential. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据