4.5 Article

Multiple logics in financialisation? Moving to carbon sustainability in build-to-rent development

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0308518X221123813

关键词

Build-to-rent; carbon; sustainability; financialisation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on the role of carbon in real estate finance, particularly in the UK build-to-rent sector. The study finds that global initiatives and pressure from institutional investors are driving developers to adopt low carbon building materials and designs. The paper highlights the diversity of financialization's logics, emphasizing the presence of a carbon logic, and examines how carbon attributes are incorporated into existing asset classes.
Real-estate has become an integral part of financialised economies, but while scholars have turned to examine the emergence of carbon markets, the role of carbon in real-estate finance has been broadly overlooked. Real-estate as a sector has been historically slow to innovate, particularly in response to pressure from climate change. More recently, the attitude of UK build-to-rent (BTR) developers to carbon is changing, partly due to global initiatives including the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs), but also pressure from institutional investors. In this paper, we provide nuanced insight into the emergence of new logics within financialisation's governance in the UK BTR sector and examine how investors attempt to steer developers into adopting low carbon building materials and designs, while identifying barriers. First, we highlight the multiplicity of financialisation's logics wrapped within assets, highlighting the presence of a carbon logic, which creates pressure for low-carbon activity. Second, we contribute to debates on assetisation and financialisation by examining the tools and knowledge used to create low-carbon real-estate assets, and how carbon attributes are 'retrofitted' into existing asset classes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据