4.6 Article

The Methodological Contributions of the Barometer of Social Capital (BARCAS) to the Measurement of Social Capital

期刊

SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH
卷 164, 期 3, 页码 1349-1377

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-022-02999-2

关键词

Social capital measurement methodology; Social capital; Colombia; Social fabric; Civic capital; Social media; Social capital and Political sociology

资金

  1. Departamento Nacional de Planeacion (DNP)
  2. Banco de la Republica
  3. Ecopetrol
  4. Colciencias
  5. Fundacion Bolivar-Davivienda
  6. Fundacion Promigas
  7. Fundacion Surtigas
  8. Fundacion Restrepo Barco
  9. Fundacion Saldarriaga Concha
  10. Confandi
  11. Comfenalco
  12. Puerto Bahia
  13. Esenttia
  14. Refineria de Cartagena
  15. Bogota
  16. Cartagena and Calis Chambers of Commerce
  17. Gobernacion de Cundinamarca
  18. Barranquilla
  19. Medellin and Bucaramangas mayorships

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents the BARCAS methodology as a comprehensive research tool for measuring social capital, identifying four factors that make up social capital and explaining 76% of the variance. It emphasizes the impact of different factors on the level of social capital over time.
This study examines the complexity of measuring social capital and presents the Barometer of Social Capital (BARCAS) as a comprehensive research methodology to do so. The BARCAS is a multilevel, multi-setting, multivariate, and cross-national instrument developed in Colombia and applied four times over two decades, in 1997, 2005, 2011, and 2017. Throughout each of the four measurements, a variety of methods were used to improve the explained variance of the model and disaggregate dimensions into variables and items to determine their contribution to a factor's average change. The learning and refining processes undertaken to improve the BARCAS are described in detail. Ultimately, the 2017 iteration of the BARCAS presents us with four factors that make up social capital and explain 76% of the variance: Social Fabric, Civic Capital, Institutional Trust and Indirect Control of the State, and Faith in Unvalidated Sources of Information. Factor analysis of dimensions differentiated the factors and produced factor scores or dependent variables for each respondent. The surprising volatility of the factors' composition and levels over time indicates that the current research strategy of piecemeal hypothesis testing should be complemented by a more clinical approach, given the wide variety of intervening elements present at any given place and time. Further research could uncover whether BARCAS dimensions and factors are universal to all societies. It is hoped that the lessons learned with the BARCAS can be used by other researchers in similar endeavors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据