4.6 Article

Cruising through a pandemic: Or not?

期刊

ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2022.103499

关键词

Cruising; COVID 19; Protection Motivation Theory; Choice modelling; Tourist choice behaviour

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This project utilizes a choice experiment to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on consumer preferences in the cruise industry. The findings suggest that cruise organizations need to adjust their marketing and service strategies to meet the new demands, such as emphasizing COVID-19 safety measures and cancellation refunds. The study reveals that although travel behaviors have changed, the underlying preferences of cruise consumers remain largely unaffected.
While the cruise industry is expected to rebound from the pandemic, the features of the cruise value offering that once appealed to the market and cruise specific consumer behaviour have changed. This project employs a choice experiment to determine how COVID-19 has influenced 808 consumers' preferences for and trade-offs between specific aspects of the cruise experience across four different COVID-19 scenarios. Such insight is highly valuable for cruise organisations seeking to better understand the evaluative criteria by which their consumer segments are now guiding their decisions. Theoretically, we test how Protection Motivation Theory affects preferences under different risk scenarios. Practical contributions include a need to revise marketing communications, promotions, and service to emphasise COVID-19 safe measures, outdoor cabins and cancellation refunds, and that adjustments to targeted cruise packages are needed based on age and cruise experience among segments. Our research is the first to examine preferences of cruise consumers adopting choice modelling method. We find that overall, while the way people travel has changed, the underlying preferences of travellers in this market is largely unaffected by a simulated evolving risk profile presented.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据