4.4 Article

Internal risk limits of dealers and corporate bond market making *

期刊

JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106653

关键词

Broker -dealer; Market making; Liquidity; Volcker rule; corporate bond; COVID-19 crisis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using supervisory data from the Volcker metrics, this study examines the evolution of internal risk limits of bank-affiliated corporate bond dealers from 2017 to 2020 as an indication of capacity constraints on their market making activity. The results show that dealers' internal risk limits became tighter during the market turmoil in March 2020. Despite relaxing the limits to accommodate increased liquidity demand, the adjustments were insufficient to offset the increase in risk exposures. The findings suggest that the tightness of limits is negatively associated with inventory growth at dealers' bond trading desks, especially during the COVID-19 crisis or on days with limit changes. Overall, the study highlights the importance of internal risk limits in driving dealers' provision of liquidity in times of stress.
Using novel supervisory data reported in the Volcker metrics, we examine how the internal risk limits of bank-affiliated corporate bond dealers evolved from 2017 to 2020 as indication of capacity constraints on their market making activity. We document that dealers' internal risk limits came closer to binding during the March 2020 market turmoil. Although dealers eased their limits to accommodate increased liquidity demand, limit adjustments were not enough to offset the increase in risk exposures. We find limit tightness is negatively associated with subsequent inventory growth at dealers' bond trading desks, especially during the COVID-19 crisis or on days with limit changes. Overall, our results indicate the importance of internal risk limits in driving dealers' liquidity provision in time of stress. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据