4.7 Article

Hot executive functions are comparable across monolingual and bilingual elementary school children: Results from a study with the Iowa Gambling Task

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988609

关键词

bilingual advantage; executive functions (EF); hot EF; Iowa Gambling Task (IGT); pupillometry; mental effort

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  2. Universitaet Leipzig [1594/2-1, 3216/3-1, 1363/6-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous research found differences in executive functions (EF) between monolingual and bilingual children. Recent studies have reported advantages in processing efficiency or mental effort in bilingual adults and children. However, studies involving emotionally significant EF tasks are limited, leading to inconclusive results. This study investigates performance in a task of the hot EF domain using behavioral data and pupillary changes as a measure of mental effort. Results show that bilingual children exhibit a slightly more mature decision-making strategy in a reversed task version compared to monolingual children, but there is no difference in mental effort between the two groups. The implications of these findings for the bilingual advantage assumption will be discussed.
Past research found performance differences between monolingual and bilingual children in the domain of executive functions (EF). Furthermore, recent studies have reported advantages in processing efficiency or mental effort in bilingual adults and children. These studies mostly focused on the investigation of cold EF tasks. Studies including measures of hot EF, i.e., tasks operating in an emotionally significant setting, are limited and hence results are inconclusive. In the present study, we extend previous research by investigating performance in a task of the hot EF domain by both behavioral data and mental effort via pupillary changes during task performance. Seventy-three monolingual and bilingual school children (mean age = 107.23 months, SD = 10.26) solved the Iowa Gambling Task in two different conditions. In the standard task, characterized by constant gains and occasional losses, children did not learn to improve their decision-making behavior. In a reversed task version, characterized by constant losses and occasional gains, both monolinguals and bilinguals learned to improve their decision-making behavior over the course of the task. In both versions of the task, children switched choices more often after losses than after gains. Bilinguals switched their choices less often than monolinguals in the reversed task, indicating a slightly more mature decision-making strategy. Mental effort did not differ between monolinguals and bilinguals. Conclusions of these findings for the bilingual advantage assumption will be discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据