4.7 Review

Methods of increasing cultural competence in nurses working in clinical practice: A scoping review of literature 2011-2021

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936181

关键词

education; training; cultural competence; nursing; development

资金

  1. Grant Agency of the University of South Bohemia
  2. [046/2021/S]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of cultural competence for nurses is often neglected in professional training, however, demographic changes and cultural diversity among patients require nurses to acquire the necessary cultural knowledge, skills, and attitudes to provide high-quality healthcare.
AimTraining for the development of cultural competence is often not part of the professional training of nurses within the European Economic Area. Demographic changes in society and the cultural diversity of patients require nurses and other medical staff to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients from different cultural backgrounds. Therefore, nurses must acquire the necessary cultural knowledge, skills, and attitudes as part of their training and professional development to provide culturally competent care to achieve this objective. ObjectiveThis review aims to summarize existing methods of developing cultural competence in nurses working in clinical practice. DesignA scoping review of the literature. MethodThe following databases were used: PubMed, ScienceDirect, ERIH Plus, and Web of Science using keywords; study dates were from 2011 to 2021. ResultsThe analysis included six studies that met the selection criteria. The studies were categorized as face-to-face, simulations, and online education learning methods. ConclusionEducational training for cultural competence is necessary for today's nursing. The training content should include real examples from practice, additional time for self-study using modules, and an assessment of personal attitudes toward cultural differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据