4.6 Article

Additive-assisted defect passivation of perovskite with metformin hydrochloride: toward high-performance p-i-n perovskite solar cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-ENERGY
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2515-7655/ac975a

关键词

additives; metformin hydrochloride; perovskite solar cells; defect passivation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51673139, 91633301]
  2. development of key academic projects in Jiangsu universities
  3. National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for New Functional Polymer Materials
  4. Suzhou Nanotechnology Collaborative Innovation Center
  5. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX22_3186]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By introducing metformin hydrochloride as an additive, defects at the grain boundaries and surfaces of perovskite thin films can be passivated, leading to enhanced photovoltaic performance and stability.
Defects at the grain boundaries and surfaces of perovskite thin films are the key factors that cause nonradiative recombination, thus restricting the performance of perovskite solar cells (Pero-SCs). By introducing foreign additives to manage the chemical environment of the precursor, perovskite films can obtain optimized morphology and reduced defects, thereby enhancing the photovoltaic performance and stability of derived Pero-SCs. Herein, we report the bifunctional molecule metformin hydrochloride (MetHCl), whose multidentate structure is capable of simultaneously passivating several sorts of defects in perovskite films. Concurrently, the strong binding ability to Pb2+ makes it impressive in regulating perovskite crystallization. The nonvolatile MetHCl can remain in the perovskite film, contributing to acquiring a high-quality film with denser grains and fewer pinholes. Finally, p-i-n Pero-SCs containing the MetHCl additive exhibited enhanced stability and achieved a champion power conversion efficiency of 21.59% with an open-circuit voltage of 1.17 V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据