4.8 Article

Enhancing I0/I- Conversion Efficiency by Starch Confinement in Zinc-Iodine Battery

期刊

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eem2.12522

关键词

aqueous battery; conversion efficiency; iodine-zinc battery; starch confinement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The redox couple of I-0/I- in aqueous rechargeable iodine-zinc (I-2-Zn) batteries shows promise as a safe, cost-effective, and steady energy storage resource. However, their cycle life and efficiency are hindered by uncontrolled polyiodide shuttling and side reactions on the Zn anode. By utilizing starch to confine polyiodide shuttling, the I-0/I- conversion efficiency of I-2-Zn batteries is significantly improved. This work provides inspiration for the rational design of high-performance and low-cost I-2-Zn batteries in aqueous zinc-ion batteries (AZIBs).
The redox couple of I-0/I- in aqueous rechargeable iodine-zinc (I-2-Zn) batteries is a promising energy storage resource since it is safe and cost-effective, and provides steady output voltage. However, the cycle life and efficiency of these batteries remain unsatisfactory due to the uncontrolled shuttling of polyiodide (I-3(-) and I-5(-)) and side reactions on the Zn anode. Starch is a very low-cost and widely sourced food used daily around the world. Starch turns blue when it encounters iodine is a classic chemical reaction, which results from the unique structure of the helix starch molecule-iodine complex. Inspired by this, we employ starch to confine the shuttling of polyiodide, and thus, the I-0/I- conversion efficiency of an I-2-Zn battery is clearly enhanced. According to the detailed characterizations and theoretical DFT calculation results, the enhancement of I-0/I- conversion efficiency is mainly originated from the strong bonding between the charged products of I-3(-) and I-5(-) and the rich hydroxyl groups in starch. This work provides inspiration for the rational design of high-performance and low-cost I-2-Zn in AZIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据