4.7 Article

Preparation and properties of ethylene-acrylic acid co polymer/Surlyn-Zn2+/zinc stearate blends ionic interlayer membrane

期刊

ADVANCED COMPOSITES AND HYBRID MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 2078-2091

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s42114-022-00544-w

关键词

Ethylene-acrylic acid copolymer; Surlyn resin; Zinc stearate; Light transmittance; Yield strength

资金

  1. technical innovation and application development project of Chongqing Science and Technology Bureau [cstc2019jscx-msxmX0045]
  2. Innovation Research Group at Institutions of Higher Education in Chongqing [CXQT19027]
  3. Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia [IF_2020_NBU_306]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of Surlyn-Zn2+ and zinc stearate effectively enhances the properties of self-made ionic interlayer, leading to improved light transmittance and strength of safety glass.
Surlyn-Zn2+ and zinc stearate have been used to synergistic modify ethylene-acrylic acid co-polymer (EAA), and the EAA/Surlyn-Zn2+/zinc stearate blend was prepared by blending and extrusion. The morphological and physical properties of self-made ionic inter-layer membranes were studied by differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis, rotating rheometer, and scanning electron microscopy. The experimental results show that the combination of Surlyn-Zn2+ and zinc stearate significantly improves the mechanical properties, crystallinity, thermal stability, and rheological properties of the self-made ionic interlayer. The scanning electron microscope results indicate that the phases have been improved. The light transmittance, yield strength, and bonding strength of safety glass are improved significantly by using a ternary blend system as an interlayer film with the ratio 90/10/0.6 for EAA/Surlyn-Zn2+/zinc stearate. Meanwhile, the light transmittance for the safety glass reached 80.58% and the yield strength reached 73.1 MPa. Furthermore, no degumming can be seen in the glass broke during the bond strength test.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据