4.7 Review

Recent Development of Photoresponsive Liposomes Based on Organic Photosensitizers, Au Nanoparticles, and Azobenzene Derivatives for Nanomedicine

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 10, 页码 14171-14190

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.2c03167

关键词

nanovesicles; light excitation; photoresponsive nanoliposomes; photothermal effect; photoisomerization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photoresponsive liposomes are controlled-release liposomes modified by photoresponsive materials, which can regulate the permeability of phospholipid bilayers through photothermal or photoisomerization effects. They are widely used as a cutting-edge strategy in nanomedicine.
Photoresponsive liposomes are controlled-release liposomes modified by photoresponsive materials. They use light with high spatial and temporal precision as a means of regulation. After excitation by light at appropriate wavelengths, photoresponsive liposomes can influence the permeability of phospholipid bilayers through the photothermal or photoisomerization effect of photo responsive materials. The photothermal effect causes the phospholipid layer to become dispersed by local heating, and the photoisomerization effect modulates the release behavior by establishing permeation channels on the phospholipid layer through changes in the dipole moments of azobenzene derivatives. Currently, photoresponsive liposomes are widely used as a cutting-edge strategy for nanomedicine. In this paper, three types of photo responsive liposomes based on organic photosensitizers, Au nanoparticles, and azobenzene derivatives with abundant research reports were introduced based on the differences in the photoresponse principles and forms of different photoresponsive materials. This review aims to reflect the differences in the structures, properties, photoresponsive materials, and principles of action of different photoresponsive liposomes. Moreover, this work outlines the current status of their application in the field of nanomedicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据