4.7 Article

Schiff-Base Covalent Organic Framework/Carbon Nanotubes Composite for Advanced Potassium-Ion Batteries

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 10, 页码 15592-15599

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.2c03634

关键词

potassium-ion batteries; anode; covalent organic frameworks; carbon nanotubes; core-shell structure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. [22179063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a Schiff-base COF/carbon nanotubes (TP-COF/CNTs) composite was synthesized as an anode material for low-cost potassium-ion batteries. The introduction of carbon nanotubes improved the kinetics of potassium ions and increased the exposure of active sites. The TP-COF/CNTs composite exhibited advanced potassium storage performance and rate capability.
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are attractive candidates for low-cost potassium-ion battery (PIB) electrode materials due to their inherent porosity, well-organized channel structure, and excellent thermochemical stability. Herein, a Schiff-base COF/carbon nanotubes (TP-COF/CNTs) composite is synthesized by a condensation reaction between 1,3,5-triformylbenzene (TFB) and p- phenylenediamine (PPD) on the surface of CNTs as an anode for PIBs. The introduction of CNTs not only assumes the role of a conductive network in improving the kinetics of potassium ions (K+) but also induces the growth of COFs through pi-pi interactions, leading to more exposure of more active sites. In consequence, the core-shell-structured TP-COF/CNTs exhibit advanced K storage performance (290 mA h g-1 after 200 cycles at 0.1 A g-1) and fine rate capability (169 mA h g-1 at 1 A g-1), outperforming most COF materials. Furthermore, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, ex situ infrared analysis, and density functional theory calculations indicate that the storage of K+ depends on electroactive CN groups and the pi-K+ effect. This work supplies PIBs with a promising high-performance anode material and may benefit the development of COFs for PIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据