4.7 Article

Long Single Au Nanowires in Nb/Au/Nb Josephson Junctions: Implications for Superconducting Microelectronics

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.2c03837

关键词

nanowire; Josephson junction; templated electrodeposition; superconductivity; proximity effect

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [22-23-00984]
  2. scholarship of the President of the Russian Federation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a technique for obtaining long single Au nanowires and hybrid Josephson junctions, and demonstrates the prospects of using these nanowires in superconducting microelectronics through quantitative measurements. The study also discusses the relationship between the nanowire structure and the electron transport properties of the superconducting junctions.
The application of nanowires in superconducting electronic circuits is a prospective way to miniaturize conventional planar Josephson junctions. However, knowledge about nanowirebased devices' fabrication technology and their performance at low temperatures is still scarce. Here, we propose a technique for obtaining long single Au nanowires and hybrid Josephson junctions formed by coupling the nanowires to planar Nb electrodes. The prospects for using electrodeposited Au nanowires with 30 and 60 nm diameters in superconducting microelectronics are illustrated by quantitative measurements of device current-voltage characteristics with weak link lengths varying from 280 to 520 nm at temperatures down to 1.2 K. The relationship between the nanowire structure and the electron transport properties of corresponding superconducting junctions is discussed. High critical current densities of Nb/Au-nanowire/Nb systems up to 1.6 center dot 106A/cm2 combined with long-term stability make them promising candidates for the use in nanowire-based superconducting hybrid devices such as compact SQUIDs and superconducting neural networks with high integration density of circuits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据