4.4 Review

Evaluation on Underground Refuge Alternatives and Explosion Survivability: a Review

期刊

MINING METALLURGY & EXPLORATION
卷 39, 期 6, 页码 2311-2331

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s42461-022-00682-1

关键词

Refuge alternatives; Refuge chamber; Built-in place; Mine explosion; Numerical analysis

资金

  1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) [CDC-NIOSH BAA 75D301-20-R-67922]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on occupational health and safety issues in underground mining environments, specifically discussing the application and survivability of refuge alternatives (RAs) during mine disasters like explosions. The analysis considers the requirements and recommendations of various countries, examining factors such as basic human needs, waiting for rescue teams, and the physical specifications of RAs during such events.
Underground mining environments bring occupational health and safety issues with some severe dangers such as mine disasters like explosions. During such events, miners might escape using main access openings, or find a safe haven like refuge alternatives (RAs) to wait and be rescued and evacuated to the surface. In this paper, RAs are explained with their early and current applications. A classification as permanent and portable is explained depending on the conditions and their abilities. This classification is followed by the utilization and survivability of RAs with the requirements and recommendations of the main mining countries. Based on the utilization and survivability constraints, basic human requirements, waiting for a rescue team, and the required physical specifications of RAs during the events are analyzed in detail for various countries with their regulations. Among these, the specification, resistance to the explosion, is discussed in particular, and the studies in the literature are examined in terms of structural deformation. The highest deformed zones, the beneficiation of reinforcing steel components such as stiffeners, and the simulation approaches are investigated through this review.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据