4.5 Article

Perceived professional benefits and associated factors among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study

期刊

NURSING OPEN
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 1461-1470

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1396

关键词

coronavirus; nurses; perceived professional benefits; professional identity; psychological distress; severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that nurses experienced high professional benefits during the COVID-19 pandemic, despite psychological distress. Factors such as self-perceived concerns, emotional shock, risk perception, dealing with professional frustration, and professional self-reflection were positively associated with nurses' professional benefits.
Aims: To examine the perceived professional benefits (PPB) and associated factors among nurses during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in China. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Using the snowball sampling method, 492 nurses (478 females, 14 males) were recruited. Data were collected using an online survey, including participants' socio-demographic and working characteristics, psychological distress related to the COVID-19 pandemic, dealing with professional frustration, professional self-reflection and PPB from 1-30 April 2020. Results: Nurses experienced high levels of PPB. In linear regression analysis, self-perceived concerns about COVID-19, emotional shock caused by it, risk perception towards their occupations, dealing with professional frustration and professional self-reflection were positively associated with PPB among nurses. These factors explained 84% variance in PPB. Conclusions: This study highlighted that although the nurses experienced psychological distress, they gained high PPB during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, to facilitate nurses' efforts to achieve professional growth, more educational resources and opportunities for engaging in reflective practices could be provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据