4.4 Article

Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess with purulent meningitis and endogenous endophthalmitis: A case report

期刊

FRONTIERS IN SURGERY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.894929

关键词

Klebsiella pneumoniaeliver absces; meningitis; hypervirulentKlebsiella pneumoniae,; endophthalmitis; diabetes mellitus

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This case involves a patient with a Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess with infections spreading to the meninges and eyes. Diagnosis was made through ultrasound and CT scans, with treatment including percutaneous catheter drainage and antibiotics. Despite initial improvement, the patient eventually died due to severe pneumonia complications.
This is a rare but typical case of a Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess with migratory infections including purulent meningitis and endogenous endophthalmitis. The patient had a chief complaint of 7 days of fever, 4 days of blurry vision, and 4 h of glossolalia. Ultrasound scan and computed tomography (CT) suggested a liver abscess. Both blood and drainage fluid cultures grew K. pneumoniae with a high mucosal phenotype. The patient was finally diagnosed with a K. pneumoniae liver abscess, purulent meningitis, and endogenous K. pneumoniae endophthalmitis in the right eye. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) of the liver abscess was performed, and meropenem was used to control infection. The patient was given 0.1 ml of vancomycin (10 g/L) and 0.1 ml of ceftazidime (20 g/L) were by intravitreal injection for the treatment of endophthalmitis. The infection was gradually controlled after such treatments. The patient was discharged from our hospital with an improved condition. However, during the time of follow-up, she developed complications due to severe pneumonia and eventually died in a local hospital. This case revealed that a rapid diagnosis followed by appropriate treatment would improve prognosis and prevent severe metastatic complications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据