4.7 Review

The Role of Methionine Supplementation on Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Status of Poultry-A Review

期刊

AGRICULTURE-BASEL
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12101701

关键词

poultry; antioxidant defense system; methionine sources; oxidative stress

类别

资金

  1. Stipendium Hungaricum Scholarship from Tempus Public Foundation
  2. European Social Fund [EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the role of methionine in poultry and its relationship with the antioxidant system. Supplementation of methionine has been shown to improve the antioxidant status and reduce oxidative stress in poultry.
The physiological status of poultry can be disturbed by different stressors that may lead to oxidative stress conditions. Oxidative stress activates defense systems, which mitigates the adverse effects. Several lines of the poultry defense system exist, including enzyme systems such as catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and non-enzymatic antioxidants such as Glutathione (GSH). Methionine-a vital amino acid in poultry nutrition-plays a significant role in protein synthesis, transsulfuration, and transmethylation and is also involved in several biochemical pathway activations that can affect the antioxidant system. Therefore, this review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the role of methionine in poultry under heat stress or managing stress, on the antioxidants responsible for scavenging free radicals (GSH) and those responsible for detoxification (SOD, CAT, and GPx). Different levels of methionine supplementation above the requirement (up to 1% Met added on the basal diet) have been tested on the antioxidant status of poultry. It has been shown to improve the antioxidant status and reduce oxidative stress. The results of many experiments on poultry supplemented with diets of different methionine sources indicate that L-Met has good potential to stimulate the antioxidant status of poultry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据