4.6 Article

The Impact of Stroke Subtype on Recovery and Functional Outcome after Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Analysis of Factors

期刊

LIFE-BASEL
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life12091295

关键词

cerebral infarction; cerebral hemorrhage; rehabilitation; stroke; functional outcome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared inpatient rehabilitation outcomes between different subtypes of stroke and identified predictors of discharge outcomes. Despite the initial severity of stroke being worse in intracerebral hemorrhage patients, they achieved similar functional gains, independence levels, and return-home rates compared to cerebral infarction patients after inpatient rehabilitation.
The aims of this study were to compare inpatient rehabilitation outcomes between acute stroke subtypes of Cerebral Infarction (CI) and Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH), and to determine the predictors of discharge outcomes. A retrospective study of stroke inpatients was carried out using the discharge Functional Independence Measure (FIM) as the primary outcome measure. Relationships between stroke subtype, rehabilitation impairments, and medical complications on FIM -gain were analyzed. Altogether, 280 datasets including 211 (75.4%) CI and 69 (24.6%) ICH were analyzed. ICH patients were significantly younger than CI patients (55 years ICH vs. 64.0 years CI years, p < 0.001), had a 10-fold higher proportion needing ICU admission (ICH 82.6% vs. CI 7.6%, p < 0.001), and had significantly lower total admission FIM scores (67 points ICH vs. 74 CI points, p = 0.006), with lower motor-FIM scores in particular (38 points ICH vs. 48 points CI, p = 0.003). Significant functional improvements after inpatient rehabilitation, i.e., FIM gain, occurred regardless of stroke subtype (FIM-ICH Delta 27 vs. FIM-CI Delta 21, p = 0.05). Despite significantly worse initial stroke severity, ICH patients achieved similar functional gains, independence levels, and return-home rates compared with their CI counterparts after inpatient rehabilitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据