4.6 Review

Ivermectin: A Controversial Focal Point during the COVID-19 Pandemic

期刊

LIFE-BASEL
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life12091384

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; ivermectin; antiviral

资金

  1. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosio Villegas, Ciudad deMexico [14080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has confirmed the predictions made by virologists for decades. The challenge faced by the world is to find a treatment, and repurposing drugs is a viable and fast option. However, the mechanisms of action of some drugs are unknown even though they are approved for human use. Therefore, it is ideal, but not necessary, to understand the basic mechanisms of action in order to justify the therapeutic application of a drug to a new disease.
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has confirmed the apocalyptic predictions that virologists have been making for several decades. The challenge the world is facing is that of trying to find a possible treatment, and a viable and expedient option for addressing this challenge is the repurposing of drugs. However, in some cases, although these drugs are approved for use in humans, the mechanisms of action involved are unknown. In this sense, to justify its therapeutic application to a new disease, it is ideal, but not necessary, to know the basic mechanisms of action involved in a drug's biological effects. This review compiled the available information regarding the various effects attributed to Ivermectin. The controversy over its use for the treatment of COVID-19 is demonstrated by this report that considers the proposal unfeasible because the therapeutic doses proposed to achieve this effect cannot be achieved. However, due to the urgent need to find a treatment, an exhaustive and impartial review is necessary in order to integrate the knowledge that exists, to date, of the possible mechanisms through which the treatment may be helpful in defining safe doses and schedules of Ivermectin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据