4.7 Article

Exposure of Midge Larvae (Chironomus riparius) to Graphene Oxide Leads to Development Alterations

期刊

TOXICS
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxics10100588

关键词

chironomids; aquatic ecotoxicology; nano-ecotoxicology; graphene; biomarkers

资金

  1. French Ministry of National Education, Higher Education and Research
  2. European Union [696656-785219-881603]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effects of graphene oxide (GO) on the midge Chironomus riparius. The results show that GO does not impact the survival rate, but does have chronic toxicity in a dose-dependent manner. GO exposure leads to inhibited larval growth and a significant reduction in length. However, there is no increased occurrence or severity of mouthpart deformities in larvae exposed to GO.
Despite the fast-growing use and production of graphene-based nanomaterials (GBMs), data concerning their effects on freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates are scarce. This study aims to investigate the effects of graphene oxide (GO) on the midge Chironomus riparius. Mortality, growth inhibition, development delay and teratogenicity, assessed using mentum deformity analysis, were investigated after a 7-day static exposure of the first instar larvae under controlled conditions. The collected data indicated that the survival rate was not impacted by GO, whereas chronic toxicity following a dose-dependent response occurred. Larval growth was affected, leading to a significant reduction in larval length (from 4.4 to 10.1%) in individuals reaching the fourth instar at any of the tested concentrations (from 0.1 to 100 mg/L). However, exposure to GO is not associated with an increased occurrence of mouthpart deformities or seriousness in larvae. These results highlight the suitability of monitoring the larval development of C. riparius as a sensitive marker of GO toxicity. The potential ecological consequences of larval size decrease need to be considered for a complete characterization of the GO-related environmental risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据