4.7 Article

Evaluation of In Vitro Cytotoxic, Genotoxic, Apoptotic, and Cell Cycle Arrest Potential of Iron-Nickel Alloy Nanoparticles

期刊

TOXICS
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxics10090492

关键词

iron-nickel alloy nanoparticles; cytotoxicity; genotoxicity; apoptosis; cell cycle arrest; ROS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of Fe-Ni ANP exposure on human health at the cellular level. The results showed that Fe-Ni ANPs had cytotoxic and genotoxic potentials, and exerted their effects through apoptotic pathways and cell cycle arrest mechanisms. Additionally, the increased intracellular ROS was identified as the primary mechanism leading to cytotoxic, genotoxic, and apoptotic activity. These findings further demonstrated the potential risks of Fe-Ni ANPs to human health.
The use of iron-nickel alloy nanoparticles (Fe-Ni ANPs) is increasing daily in various fields. People are increasingly exposed to these nanoparticles for occupational and environmental reasons. Our study determined some of the effects of Fe-Ni ANP exposure and impacts on human health at the cellular level. The cytotoxic and genotoxic potentials of Fe-Ni ANPs were investigated by XTT, clonogenic, comet, and GammaH2AX analyses using Beas-2B cells. Annexin V, multicaspase, and cell cycle arrest methods were used to understand the apoptotic mechanism of action. The intracellular ROS method was used to determine the primary mechanism that leads to cytotoxic and genotoxic activity. The Fe-Ni ANPs showed cytotoxic activity with the XTT and clonogenic methods: they had genotoxic potential, as demonstrated via genotoxicity methods. It was determined that the cytotoxic effect was realized by the caspase-dependent apoptotic pathway, and the cells were stopped at the G0/G1 stage by Fe-Ni ANPs. Increased intracellular ROS due to Fe-Ni ANPs led to cytotoxic, genotoxic, and apoptotic activity. Potential risks to human health due to Fe-Ni ANPs were then demonstrated at the cellular level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据