4.7 Article

Urban expansion weakens the contribution of local land cover to urban warming

期刊

URBAN CLIMATE
卷 45, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101285

关键词

Time-series; Urban expansion; Local land cover; Urban warming; Multi-scale

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42101093, 41801178, 32001160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes the data from Beijing from 1985 to 2018 and finds that urban expansion and local land cover change have a joint impact on urban warming, but their relative contributions change over time and city size, with three turning points. These results can provide insights for urban planning and adaptation to the urban heat island effect.
Previous studies have shown that changes in local land cover can significantly influence air temperature. What remains unaddressed is whether, and at which point, such within-city changes would become insignificant with cities continuing to expand. Here, we identify annual urban expansion and local land cover change in Beijing from 1985 to 2018, using time-series data of impervious surfaces. We further examine their impacts on temperature using multiple linear models. We found urban expansion and local land cover change jointly affected urban warming, but their relative contribution changed over time, showing the occurrence of three turning points. The first one occurred at the city size of 976 km(2), before which the local land cover change was the predominant factor contributing to urban warming. Both factors significantly affected the mean temperature with city size growing from 976 km(2) to 2272 km(2), showing the relative importance of the local factor decreased, while the relative importance of the city-scale factor continued to increase, and became greater when the city was larger than 1646 km(2). The local factor did not play any significant role when the city area exceeded 2272 km(2). Results can provide insights on urban planning for heat mitigation and adaptation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据