4.6 Review

The effect of telemedicine on secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1020744

关键词

telemedicine; secondary prevention; atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD); effect; systematic review; meta-analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Pharmaceutical Care Special Scientific Research Project of Jiangsu Pharmaceutical Society [81873274]
  3. Jiangsu Western Learning Middle and Senior Talents Training Project [H202018]
  4. Science and Technology Project of Nanjing Lishui District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine [7]
  5. Jiangsu Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Project [LSZYJN202004]
  6. TCM Science and Technology Development Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX20_1482]
  7. [QN202005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review evaluated the efficiency of telemedicine for the secondary prevention of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and provided evidence for its application. The results showed that telemedicine, especially when using telephone intervention, had a positive impact on certain risk factors, physical activity, and exercise. However, there were controversies regarding the improvement of medication adherence, exercise compliance, muscle function, healthy diet, knowledge score, self-efficacy, and economy through telemedicine.
AimThe purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficiency of telemedicine on the secondary level of prevention of patients with arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), provide evidence for the application of telemedicine in secondary prevention and promote the development of telemedicine in secondary prevention.MethodsA computer-based search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Pubmed, EBSCO, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Randomized controlled trials regarding the effect of telemedicine on secondary prevention of ASCVD were included from inception to May, 2022. Meta-analysis was used to compare the results of the included studies by RevMan5.4 software. The Cochrane Collaboration bias risk tool was used to perform risk of bias assessment in this study. Outcomes included risk factors, physical activity and exercise, muscle function, exercise compliance, medication adherence, healthy diet, depression and anxiety, self-efficacy, knowledge score, economy, and safety endpoints. Subgroup analysis was carried out for different main intervention measures included in the literature.ResultsA total of 32 randomized clinical studies (n = 10 997 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with usual secondary prevention (USP) group, participants in telemedicine of secondary prevention (TOSP) group showed significant improvement in some risk factors including BMI (MD -0.87, p = 0.002), SBP (MD -4.09, p = 0.007) and DBP (MD -2.91, p = 0.0002) when they use the telephone as the intervention. In physical activity and exercise, Patients in TOSP showed an improvement in VO2 Peak (mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) (OR 1.58, p = 0.02), 6MWT (MD 21.41, p = 0.001), GSLTPA score (MD 2.89, p = 0.005). Effects on medication adherence, exercise compliance, muscle function, healthy diet, economy and self-efficacy were synthesized narratively. Patients in TOSP did not show a reduction in knowledge score, depression, anxiety and safety endpoints.ConclusionThere is a net benefit of secondary prevention supported by telemedicine (especially when using the telephone as an intervention) in patients with ASCVD in the terms of some risk factors, physical activity and exercise. There are still controversies in the improvement of medication adherence, exercise compliance, muscle function, healthy diet, knowledge score, self-efficacy and economy via telemedicine, which is worth exploring. Larger samples size and longer-term follow-ups are needed in future studies.Systematic review registration[], identifier [CRD42022330478].

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据