4.7 Article

Structural operability and integrity analysis of the pressure relief valve under severe accident

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2022.102301

关键词

Pressure relief valve; Severe accident; Operability; Integrity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52130604]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for Xi'an Jiaotong University [xjh032021007]
  3. SUFA Technology Industry Co., LTD.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes and evaluates the operability and integrity of pressure relief valves. Through 3D thermo-mechanical coupling simulation and creep analysis, the opening condition and structural integrity of the valves in severe accidents are studied.
The pressure relief valves are equipped in the primary circuit loop to release steam to prevent high temperature core melting in severe accident. When severe accident occurs, whether the valve can be opened smoothly and worked reliably are crucial for ensuring the safety of the reactor. In this study, the analysis and evaluation of operability and integrity of the pressure relief valve are performed. The 3D thermo-mechanical coupling simulation is conducted for closed gate valve to predict its operability by taking account of the contact nonlinearities, temperature load and mechanical load. Besides, the structural integrity analysis of the fully-open gate valve under transient thermal shock is investigated by transient fluid flow and heat transfer simulation, instantaneous stress analysis and creep analysis. The instantaneous mechanical performances at critical locations and the creep characteristics of the valve during the pressure releasing process are analyzed and then evaluated according to the RCC-MR criterion. The results show that the valve can be opened smoothly, and the integrity with negligible creep and significant creep can be ensured in the studied severe accident case. The systematic evaluation method of the structural operability and integrity in severe nuclear accident is achieved in this work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据