4.7 Article

Investigation of atomic behavior and pool boiling heat transfer of water/Fe nanofluid under different external heat fluxes and forces: A molecular dynamics approach

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2022.102308

关键词

Heat transfer; External force; Nanofluid; Pool boiling (PB); Molecular dynamics simulation

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University [RGP. 2/195/43]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses molecular dynamics simulation to investigate the effects of external forces and heat fluxes on the atomic and pool boiling heat transfer of water/Fe nano-fluid. The results demonstrate that increasing external forces and heat fluxes can enhance the maximum temperature, velocity, and density, leading to improved pool boiling heat transfer.
The boiling process is an efficient and effective heat transfer mode. Generally, different parameters such as temperature, pressure, external forces, etc., amend the pool boiling heat transfer (PBHT) rate. The present article uses molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to study the efficacy of different external forces(EFs) and heat fluxes (HFs) on the atomic and PBHT of water/Fe nano-fluid (NF) flow. This study is performed in a microchannel (MC) with Fe-walls. The atomic behavior of the simulated structure is examined using the change in maximum temperature (T), maximum velocity(V), and maximum density(D), and the PBHT is studied by the phase change time (PCT) and HF. Results show that the maximum values of T, V, and D increase with increasing the EF and HF. Numerically, with increasing EF from 0.001 to 0.005 eV/A, the maximum D, maximum V, and maximum T increase from 0.033 atom/A(3), 0.038 A/fs, and 789 K to 0.034 atom/A(3), 0.039 A/fs, and 900 K, respectively. Also, the result appears that the HF increases by increasing the applied EF, and the PCT reduces from 0.33 to 0.32 ns. So, the PBHT in the NF improves with increasing EF. On the other hand, the increase in external HF led to a reduction in the PCT (from 0.33 to 0.21 ns).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据