4.7 Article

Partitioning of the initial catalytic steps of leucyl-tRNA synthetase is driven by an active site peptide-plane flip

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03825-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Fund Flanders [Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek] [G077814N, G0A4616N]
  2. KU Leuven Research Fund [3M14022]
  3. Croatian Science Foundation [IP-2016-06-6272]
  4. CSC scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crystal structures of leucyl-tRNA synthetase in Neisseria gonorrhoeae reveal conformational changes and a peptide-plane flip in the active site that correlate with catalytic steps. These structural alterations have a significant impact on the enzyme's activity.
Crystal structures for all enzyme states of leucyl-tRNA synthetase in Neisseria gonorrhoeae reveal multi-domain conformational changes that correlate with a local peptide-plane flip in the active site to compartmentalize catalytic steps. To correctly aminoacylate tRNA(Leu), leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) catalyzes three reactions: activation of leucine by ATP to form leucyl-adenylate (Leu-AMP), transfer of this amino acid to tRNA(Leu) and post-transfer editing of any mischarged product. Although LeuRS has been well characterized biochemically, detailed structural information is currently only available for the latter two stages of catalysis. We have solved crystal structures for all enzymatic states of Neisseria gonorrhoeae LeuRS during Leu-AMP formation. These show a cycle of dramatic conformational changes, involving multiple domains, and correlate with an energetically unfavorable peptide-plane flip observed in the active site of the pre-transition state structure. Biochemical analyses, combined with mutant structural studies, reveal that this backbone distortion acts as a trigger, temporally compartmentalizing the first two catalytic steps. These results unveil the remarkable effect of this small structural alteration on the global dynamics and activity of the enzyme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据