4.7 Article

LDLR, LRP1, and Megalin redundantly participate in the uptake of Clostridium novyi alpha-toxin

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03873-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31970129]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LR20C010001]
  3. Westlake Education Foundation
  4. Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine
  5. Westlake Center for Genome Editing [20200000A992210/001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In addition to LDLR, Clostridium novyi alpha-toxin (Tcn alpha) can also use LRP1 and Megalin as cellular entry receptors. The expression levels of LDLR and LRP1 vary in different cells, suggesting that the dominant entry receptor for Tcn alpha may be cell-type dependent.
Clostridium novyi alpha-toxin (Tcn alpha) also uses LRP1 and Megalin as cellular entry receptors besides LDLR, and this might be a response to cell-type dependent receptor availability for the exotoxin. Clostridium novyi alpha-toxin (Tcn alpha) is a potent exotoxin that induces severe symptoms including gas gangrene, myositis, necrotic hepatitis, and sepsis. Tcn alpha binds to sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAG) for cell-surface attachment and utilizes low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) for rapid entry. However, it was also shown that Tcn alpha may use alternative entry receptors other than LDLR. Here, we define that LRP1 and Megalin can also facilitate the cellular entry of Tcn alpha by employing reconstitutive LDLR family proteins. LDLR, LRP1, and Megalin recognize Tcn alpha via their ligand-binding domains (also known as LDL receptor type A repeats). Notably, LDLR and LRP1 have contrasting expression levels in many different cells, thus the dominant entry receptor for Tcn alpha could be cell-type dependent. These findings together increase our knowledge of the Tcn alpha actions and further help to understand the pathogenesis of C. novyi infection-associated diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据