4.6 Article

Ultrasound Assisted Extraction of Saponins from Hedera helix L. and an In Vitro Biocompatibility Evaluation of the Extracts

期刊

PHARMACEUTICALS
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph15101197

关键词

Hedera helix; saponins; ultrasound; cytotoxicity; biocompatibility

资金

  1. Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation, ActionJoint Demonstration [PN-III-P2-PED-2019-2118, 381PED/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to determine the optimal conditions for ultrasound assisted extraction of saponins from Hedera helix L. leaves and evaluate the in vitro biocompatibility of the richest saponin extracts. The study found that the best extraction conditions were a temperature of 50 degrees C, an ultrasound amplitude of 40%, an extraction time of 60 min, a plant material to solvent ratio of 1:20 (w:v), and 80% ethanol as solvent. The extracts were cytocompatible with L929 fibroblast cell lines at concentrations below 200 μg/mL after 48 h of treatment.
The aim of this study was to establish the best ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE) conditions of saponins from Hedera helix L. leaves and to evaluate the in vitro biocompatibility of the extracts richest in saponins. Different parameters, such as extraction time, temperature, ultrasound power, solvent to plant material ratio, and solvent concentration, were investigated. The most efficient extraction conditions were a temperature of 50 degrees C, an ultrasound amplitude of 40%, an extraction time of 60 min, a plant material to solvent ratio of 1:20 (w:v), and 80% ethanol as solvent. In vitro cytotoxicity of the extracts richest in saponins and their influence on the DNA content of L929 (NCTC) fibroblasts were tested. Until 200 mu g/mL, the studied extracts were cytocompatible with L929 fibroblast cell lines at 48 h of treatment. These in vitro cell culture results provide useful information for further applications of Hedera helix extracts in a pharmaceutical field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据