4.6 Review

From Snake Venoms to Therapeutics: A Focus on Natriuretic Peptides

期刊

PHARMACEUTICALS
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph15091153

关键词

natriuretic peptide; natriuretic peptide receptor; venom peptides; therapeutics

资金

  1. Singapore National Health Innovation Centre (NHIC) [I2D-1612150]
  2. Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology Centre (SMART) [ING-000101 BIO]
  3. Singapore National Medical Research Council (NMRC) Centre Grant [CG21APR1008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Snake venom is a mixture of multifunctional biomolecules that serves the purpose of capturing prey and self-defense. Natriuretic peptides found in the venom have the ability to lower blood pressure, paralyze prey, and potentially be used in drug therapy for heart failure.
Snake venom is a cocktail of multifunctional biomolecules that has evolved with the purpose of capturing prey and for defense. These biomolecules are classified into different classes based on their functions. They include three-finger toxins, natriuretic peptides, phospholipases and metalloproteinases. The focus for this review is on the natriuretic peptide (NP), which is an active component that can be isolated from the venoms of vipers and mambas. In these venoms, NPs contribute to the lowering of blood pressure, causing a rapid loss of consciousness in the prey such that its mobility is reduced, paralyzing the prey, and often death follows. Over the past 30 years since the discovery of the first NP in the venom of the green mamba, venom NPs have shown potential in the development of drug therapy for heart failure. Venom NPs have long half-lives, different pharmacological profiles, and may also possess different functions in comparison to the mammalian NPs. Understanding their mechanisms of action provides the strategies needed to develop new NPs for treatment of heart failure. This review summarizes the venom NPs that have been identified over the years and how they can be useful in drug development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据