4.6 Article

Safety, Tolerability, and Serum/Tear Pharmacokinetics of Human Recombinant Epidermal Growth Factor Eyedrops in Healthy Subjects

期刊

PHARMACEUTICALS
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph15111312

关键词

dry eye disease; epidermal growth factor; first-in-human study; pharmacokinetics

资金

  1. Daewoong Bio Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of rhEGF eyedrops in healthy subjects. The results showed that rhEGF eyedrops were safe and well-tolerated, with mild and transient adverse reactions. Tear EGF concentrations rapidly increased and returned to baseline, while serum EGF levels remained unchanged after administration of rhEGF eyedrops.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of rhEGF eyedrops after the administration of single and multiple doses in healthy subjects. A phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and single-ascending dose (SAD) and multiple-ascending dose (MAD) study were conducted in three dose groups (10, 50, and 100 mu g/mL). The subjects randomly received rhEGF eyedrops or the placebo in a 3:1 ratio. Serial blood and tear samples for PK analysis were collected up to 36 h and 180 h post-dose in SAD and MAD studies, respectively. In addition, the serum and tear EGF concentrations were measured. Immunogenicity evaluations were conducted using serum anti-EGF antibody levels. A total of 50 subjects were enrolled and 48 subjects completed the study. Adverse drug reactions were mild and transient. There were no serious adverse events in this study. The tear EGF concentrations rapidly increased and returned to baseline after 4 h without any serum EGF level change after the administration of rhEGF eyedrops. rhEGF eyedrops were safe and well-tolerated in healthy subjects in a dose range of 10-100 mu g/mL, indicating suitability for further studies in patients with corneal injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据