4.5 Article

Effect of Climate on Photovoltaic Yield Prediction Using Machine Learning Models

期刊

GLOBAL CHALLENGES
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/gch2.202200166

关键词

climate; forecasting; Koppen-Geiger; machine learning; photovoltaics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study predicts the power of 48 PV systems around the world using machine learning and investigates the effect of climate on yield predictions. The results show that the performance ranking of the machine learning algorithms is independent of climate. Systems in dry climates have the lowest prediction error, while those in tropical climates have the highest.
Machine learning is arising as a major solution for the photovoltaic (PV) power prediction. Despite the abundant literature, the effect of climate on yield predictions using machine learning is unknown. This work aims to find climatic trends by predicting the power of 48 PV systems around the world, equally divided into four climates. An extensive data gathering process is performed and open-data sources are prioritized. A website www.tudelft.nl/open-source-pv-power-databases has been created with all found open data sources for future research. Five machine learning algorithms and a baseline one have been trained for each PV system. Results show that the performance ranking of the algorithms is independent of climate. Systems in dry climates depict on average the lowest Normalized Root Mean Squared Error (NRMSE) of 47.6 %, while those in tropical present the highest of 60.2 %. In mild and continental climates the NRMSE is 51.6 % and 54.5 %, respectively. When using a model trained in one climate to predict the power of a system located in another climate, on average systems located in cold climates show a lower generalization error, with an additional NRMSE as low as 5.6 % depending on the climate ofthe test set. Robustness evaluations were also conducted that increase the validity of the results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据