4.7 Article

The Evolution of a Large Biobank at Mass General Brigham

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081323

关键词

Mass General Brigham Biobank; biobank; biorepository; personalized medicine; precision medicine; translational research; research operations

资金

  1. NIAMS [P30 AR070253]
  2. NHGRI [U01 HG008685, 5UM1HG008895]
  3. IBM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mass General Brigham Biobank is a large repository of biospecimens and data aimed at supporting translational research on disease phenotypes. It has enrolled over 135,000 participants, generated genomic data on more than 65,000 participants, and served numerous institutional studies. However, it faces challenges in terms of funding sustainability, integration into clinical workflows, and promoting diversity and equity in research resources.
The Mass General Brigham Biobank (formerly Partners HealthCare Biobank) is a large repository of biospecimens and data linked to extensive electronic health record data and survey data. Its objective is to support and enable translational research focused on genomic, environmental, biomarker and family history associations with disease phenotypes. The Biobank has enrolled more than 135,000 participants, generated genomic data on more than 65,000 of its participants, distributed approximately 153,000 biospecimens, and served close to 450 institutional studies with biospecimens or data. Although the Biobank has been successful, based on some measures of output, this has required substantial institutional investment. In addition, several challenges are ongoing, including: (1) developing a sustainable cost model that doesn't rely as heavily on institutional funding; (2) integrating Biobank operations into clinical workflows; and (3) building a research resource that is diverse and promotes equity in research. Here, we describe the evolution of the Biobank and highlight key lessons learned that may inform other efforts to build biobanking efforts in health system contexts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据