4.7 Review

Glioblastoma-Specific Strategies of Vascularization: Implications in Anti-Angiogenic Therapy Resistance

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101625

关键词

glioblastoma; anti-angiogenic therapy resistance; glioblastoma stem-like cells

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [RF-2016-02361089]
  2. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [26515]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiogenesis plays a crucial role in the growth and progression of GBM, and targeting GBM angiogenesis in cancer therapy has gained increasing attention. However, recent studies have shown that anti-angiogenic treatments have limited effects and can lead to tumor resistance and increased aggressiveness. This review summarizes the neovascularization processes associated with GBM and discusses the drug resistance mechanisms underlying the transient efficacy of current anti-angiogenic therapies. Potential strategies and perspectives to overcome GBM's resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy are also described as new potential therapeutic approaches.
Angiogenesis has long been implicated as a crucial process in GBM growth and progression. GBM can adopt several strategies to build up its abundant and aberrant vasculature. Targeting GBM angiogenesis has gained more and more attention in anti-cancer therapy, and many strategies have been developed to interfere with this hallmark. However, recent findings reveal that the effects of anti-angiogenic treatments are temporally limited and that tumors become refractory to therapy and more aggressive. In this review, we summarize the GBM-associated neovascularization processes and their implication in drug resistance mechanisms underlying the transient efficacy of current anti-angiogenic therapies. Moreover, we describe potential strategies and perspectives to overcome the mechanisms adopted by GBM to develop resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy as new potential therapeutic approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据