4.7 Article

Inference of metabolic fluxes in nutrient-limited continuous cultures: A Maximum Entropy approach with the minimum information

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 25, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105450

关键词

-

资金

  1. Horizon 2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Action-Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (MSCA-RISE) [734439]
  2. CITMA Project of the Republic of Cuba
  3. PNCB-Statistical Mechanics of Metabolic Interaction [PN223LH010-015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of cellular metabolism is limited by the available experimental data. Maximum Entropy (ME) inference has been used to extract predictions from measurements in cellular metabolism. In chemostat cultures of E.coli, the growth rate and uptake rates of limiting nutrients are found to provide the most informative observations. This observation can be explained by the chemostat dynamics driving nutrient-limited cultures towards metabolically restricted states.
The study of cellular metabolism is limited by the amount of experimental data available. Formulations able to extract relevant predictions from accessible measurements are needed. Maximum Entropy (ME) inference has been successfully applied to genome-scale models of cellular metabolism, and recent data-driven studies have suggested that in chemostat cultures of Escherichia coli (E. coli), the growth rate and uptake rates of limiting nutrients are the most informative observables. We propose the thesis that this can be explained by the chemostat dynamics, which typically drives nutrient-limited cultures toward observable metabolic states maximally restricted in the dimensions of those fluxes. A practical consequence is that relevant flux observables can now be replaced by culture parameters usually controlled. We test our model by using simulations, and then we apply it to E. coli experimental data where we evaluate the quality of the inference, comparing it to alternative formulations that rest on convex optimization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据