4.7 Article

Dissociation of ERMES clusters plays a key role in attenuating the endoplasmic reticulum stress

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 25, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105362

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [17H06414, 19H03174, 17H06413, 17H06420, 18H05275, 15H05705, 22227003]
  2. AMED-PRIME from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED [JP20gm5910026]
  3. Naito Foundation [JPMJCR12M1]
  4. JST [JPMJCR12M1]
  5. AMED [21gm1410002h0002]
  6. Takeda Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the authors discovered that mitochondrial dynamics control the number of ERMES clusters and that ER stress causes dissociation of the ERMES clusters, leading to a delay in phospholipid transport. The impaired phospholipid transport contributes to phospholipid accumulation in the ER, expanding the ER for ER stress attenuation. These findings suggest that ERMES dissociation is an overlooked pathway of the ER stress response.
In yeast, ERMES, which mediates phospholipid transport between the ER and mitochondria, forms a limited number of oligomeric clusters at ER-mitochondria contact sites in a cell. Although the number of the ERMES clusters appears to be regulated to maintain proper inter-organelle phospholipid trafficking, its underlying mechanism and physiological relevance remain poorly understood. Here, we show that mitochondrial dynamics control the number of ERMES clusters. Moreover, we find that ER stress causes dissociation of the ERMES clusters independently of Ire1 and Hac1, canonical ER-stress response pathway components, leading to a delay in the phospholipid transport from the ER to mitochondria. Our biochemical and genetic analyses strongly suggest that the impaired phospholipid transport contributes to phospholipid accumulation in the ER, expanding the ER for ER stress attenuation. We thus propose that the ERMES dissociation constitutes an overlooked pathway of the ER stress response that operates in addition to the canonical Ire1/Hac1-dependent pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据