4.6 Article

Morpho-Phylogenetic Evidence Reveals New Species of Fuscosporellaceae and Savoryellaceae from Freshwater Habitats in Guizhou Province, China

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNGI
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jof8111138

关键词

3 new taxa; asexual fungi; multi-gene; wood-inhabiting fungi; sordariomycetes; taxonomy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1812401]
  2. Karst Science Research Center of Guizhou province [U1812401]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A survey of freshwater fungi in Guizhou Province, China, identified six new species belonging to Fuscosporellaceae and Savoryellaceae. The new taxa were characterized based on morphology, phylogenetic analysis, and culture characteristics. Detailed descriptions and illustrations were provided for each new species, and the first report of Fuscosporella species in China was made.
During a survey of freshwater fungi in Guizhou Province, China, six hyphomycetous collections were founded on decaying wood from freshwater habitats. These taxa were characterized and identified based on morphology, phylogeny, and culture characteristics. Phylogenetic analysis of combined LSU, SSU, ITS, RPB2 and TEF1 alpha sequence data indicated that our six isolates formed three distinct lineages and were distributed within Fuscosporellaceae and Savoryellaceae. They can be organized as three new species: Fuscosporella guizhouensis, Mucispora aquatica and Neoascotaiwania guizhouensis. Fuscosporella guizhouensis and Neoascotaiwania guizhouensis have sporodochial conidiomata, micronematous conidiophores and dark brown conidia. The former possesses irregularly ellipsoidal conidia with apical appendages, while the latter has fusiform to obovoid conidia. Mucispora aquatica is characterized by macronematous conidiophores, elongating percurrently and dark brown, narrowly obovoid conidia. The detailed, illustrated descriptions and notes for each new taxon are provided, and the species of Fuscosporella is reported for the first time in China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据