4.6 Article

Functional Roles of LaeA-like Genes in Fungal Growth, Cellulase Activity, and Secondary Metabolism in Pleurotus ostreatus

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNGI
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jof8090902

关键词

LaeA; fungal growth; cellulase; polysaccharides; Pleurotus ostreatus

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31902090]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Henan Province [222102110431, 202102110019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study characterized the LaeA homologs in Pleurotus ostreatus and found that they play crucial roles in the biosynthesis of polysaccharides and cellulase. PoLaeA1 regulates polysaccharide biosynthesis through intracellular ROS levels, whereas PoLaeA2 and PoLaeA3 regulate cellulase activity through intracellular Ca2+ signaling.
The global regulator LaeA plays crucial roles in morphological development and secondary metabolite biosynthesis in filamentous fungi. However, the functions of LaeA in basidiomycetes are less reported. The basidiomycete Pleurotus ostreatus is a well-known fungus used both in medicine and as food that produces polysaccharides and cellulolytic enzymes. In this study, we characterized three LaeA homologs (PoLaeA1, PoLaeA2, and PoLaeA3) in P. ostreatus. PoLaeA1 showed different expression patterns than PoLaeA2 and PoLaeA3 during different developmental stages. Silencing PoLaeA1 decreased the intracellular polysaccharide (IPS) content by approximately 28-30% and reduced intracellular ROS levels compared with those of the WT strain. However, silencing PoLaeA2 and PoLaeA3 decreased cellulase activity by 31-34% and 35-40%, respectively, and reduced the cytosolic Ca2+ content, compared with those of the WT strain. Further analysis showed that PoLaeA1 regulated IPS biosynthesis through intracellular ROS levels, whereas PoLaeA2 and PoLaeA3 regulated cellulase activity through intracellular Ca2+ signaling. Our results provide new insights into the regulation of polysaccharide biosynthesis and cellulase production in filamentous fungi.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据